[antlr-interest] Abstract tree parser

[Jim Idle]

And you should pretty much always use the superClass option for any serious project.

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org [mailto:antlr-interest-
> bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Terence Parr
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:09 PM
> To: Christian Pontesegger
> Cc: antlr-interest at antlr.org
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Abstract tree parser
> 
> Hi. when I need to do this I use superClass option.
> Ter
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Christian Pontesegger wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am creating a treeparser in java which needs some methods. I do not
> > want to put them into the @members section as the code is quite
> large.
> > Is there a way to create an abstract class for the parser? Then I
> could
> > put the the abstract methods into the @members section and implement
> > them in a subclass.
> >
> > Is there a way to do that?
> >
> > thanks
> > Christian
> >
> > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> > Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-
> interest/your-email-address
> 
> 
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-
> email-address