[antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ???

[Scott Stanchfield]

Sounds good. Normally I'd say use the same package names as before,
but because you're doing a rewrite having a different package name is
a good idea imho.

-- Scott

----------------------------------------
Scott Stanchfield
http://javadude.com



On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:
> good point. so org.stringtemplate.v4.* and org.antlr.v4.* right?
>
> Ter
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Scott Stanchfield wrote:
>
>> Sounds cool, but I'd suggest using a similar convention for both antlr
>> and stringtemplate so it'll be easier come v5 ;)
>>
>> -- Scott
>
>