[antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ???

Sam Harwell sharwell at pixelminegames.com
Sun Jan 24 12:54:47 PST 2010

I guess you could use codegen.* for the tool instead, so you'd end up
with org.antlr.runtime, org.antlr.codegen, etc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Terence Parr [mailto:parrt at cs.usfca.edu] 
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:50 PM
To: Sam Harwell
Cc: antlr-interest at antlr.org
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ???

what does compiler mean here?
On Jan 24, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Sam Harwell wrote:

> What about org.antlr.compiler.*?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
> [mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Terence Parr
> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: antlr-interest at antlr.org interest
> Subject: [antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ???
> Hi. to avoid classes where antlr v3 and v4 have to coexist in a
> is it ok if i use org.antlr.v4 as the root package?
> ST v4 is cool since it's org.stringtemplate.* old was
> org.antlr.stringtemplate.*
> Ter
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

More information about the antlr-interest mailing list