[antlr-interest] [stringtemplate-interest] anybody care to comment on bitbucket.org?

[Justin Murray]

I use TortoiseGit on Windows, and it works really well for my projects. 
It just integrates into Windows Explorer, and provides context menu 
entries for everything. It may not be as feature full as TortoiseHg, but 
I really haven't found it to be lacking any functionality that I would 
actually need. I'd suggest giving it a try, I really like it.

- Justin

On 1/18/2012 11:01 AM, Terence Parr wrote:
> I'm leaning towards git but Sam Harwell, who is super important on this project, using windows and would need good git gui outside of dev tool. Can anybody comment on what is useful (non cmd-line)?
>
> Ter
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:54, John D. Mitchell<jdmitchell at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Hg and Git are comparable on a feature basis.
>>
>> However, Hg and Git are built with very different philosophies. Git is perfectly happy to allow mutation of history.
>>
>> By default, public repositories are not rebase-able. The fact that something _can_ be achieved should not be held against it.
>>
>> And locally, if you don't want to rebase, don't. I find that on small, private-only "feature" branches or "experiment" branches, that rebasing is a useful tool. So is cherry picking. Knowing when to use a powerful tool is part of being a good technician/ programmer.
>>
>> Git was a steep learning curve for me. "Pro Git" book I find excellent. Bought a paper copy.
>>
>> I used bitkeeper, arch/tla, and cvs etc. in the past. I think others have said, but git stash is a godsend, as well as other bits and bobs.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> stringtemplate-interest mailing list
>> stringtemplate-interest at antlr.org
>> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/stringtemplate-interest
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address