[antlr-interest] pull requests at github
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Fri Sep 21 12:14:28 PDT 2012
Hi. I just added it to the FAQ
http://www.antlr.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33947666
and to the 3.5 readme.
Ter
On Sep 21, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote:
> Ter,
>
> It has been a couple of months since you wrote this.
>
> Is this an accurate description of your "GitHub pull accepting process"?
>
> If so, could you add it into a "Developer's" section of the ANTLR V3
> (and V4) FAQ, or, alternatively, as an explicit statement in the V3/V4
> READMEs (or both)?
>
> I would like to be able to refer to your process in my reply to Mike
> Lischke on the subject of patches to the C runtime. It seems we both
> have some patches which really should be incorporated into the official
> ANTLR v3 project.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen Gaito
>
>
> On 14/07/12 01:03, Terence Parr wrote:
>> Hi Gang, thanks very much for all the helpful and insightful suggestions. I also talked it over in person with a few people yesterday. Sounds like the simplest thing to do is to create a single contributors file in the repository that contains the contributors license. Anyone that wants to be a contributor, can simply fork, add their name, commit, send a pull request and then they are in the system. Any future pull requests can be merged with a quick check on their name. The contributors file can also be augmented with their signoff him during the first pull request.
>>
>> This would be on a per project basis.
>>
>> On a related problem with pull requests. As Sam Harwell pointed out to me, github has a pretty serious problem when it comes to forked repositories.
>>
>>> We've started fully qualifying everything in our normal commits, but the pull requests are still being merged with the syntax "Merge pull request #23 from parrt/master", which will then propagate to and mess up the issues of everyone who merges antlr/antlr4 into their forks.
>> This I guess is only a problem if you are creating your own issues in your own fork of antlr, right? Can anyone comment on this problem?
>>
>> Ter
>>
>> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
>> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list