[stringtemplate-interest] Conditional statements

Kay Roepke kroepke at dolphin-services.de
Sat May 6 12:58:43 PDT 2006


On 6. May 2006, at 21:51 Uhr, David Moshal wrote:

> I've always thought that extreme MVC separation isn't the goal, but  
> rather
> that each element of the
> M,V and C, should contain elements of all three, with particular  
> emphasis on
> one.

I don't think so either, at least that was the impression I got from  
Ter's postings.
But the problem currently is to get expression handling into ST,  
mainly because of time issues,
even if it is "only" boolean expressions. (And at that it should  
stop, too, IMHO).

> Indeed, this is currently the case with ST, which supports $if$  
> anyway (a
> 'C').
> And the template itself is persistent, so it is a Model for the View.

Yeah, that happens to me all the time, too ;) Seeing MVC everwhere.  
It starts to get creepy once you
see colleagues that way...

> My ZAR 0.02.

:)

-k




More information about the stringtemplate-interest mailing list