[stringtemplate-interest] Support or interface Iterable

[Terence Parr]

On Oct 19, 2006, at 7:35 AM, John Snyders wrote:

> That explains it, thanks.
> I didn't notice that Iterable was new in 1.5. That makes sense  
> since it
> seems to go hand in hand with the new foreach syntax.
>
> At least some parts of stringtemplate are generated from ANTLR so  
> is it
> possible/difficult to have a 1.5 version of StringTemplate spit  
> out? Are
> there other things worth taking advantage of? Probably most new  
> things don't
> impact the StringTemplate implementation.

Well, you can compile the source in 1.5 no problem and tweak it for  
Iterable I guess.  If we add that classname, it won't compile in <1.5.
Ter