[stringtemplate-interest] Separation of View and Biz Logic

[Terence Parr]

On May 16, 2007, at 5:33 AM, John Snyders wrote:

> What you describe is not unreasonable but with newer builds of ST  
> there
> is a better option. The format option. It is not yet documented except
> in this thread
> http://www.antlr.org:8080/pipermail/stringtemplate-interest/2006- 
> December/000847.html
> This reminds me that I should document it soon.
> -John

And I need to rebuild the grammars in ANTLR v3 to remove dependency  
with v2.

I am thinking about breaking backward compatibility a bit in terms of  
template loading.  It's kind of hosed how there is a diff between  
templates, directories of templates, and ST group objects.  In  
principle, groups should operate just like a directory of templates.   
More thinking on it later.

Ter