[stringtemplate-interest] Stringtemplate performances : some figures

Mathieu Clabaut mathieu.clabaut at gmail.com
Sun Mar 1 12:42:21 PST 2009


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 21:24, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:

> On Mar 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Mathieu Clabaut wrote:
>
>>
>>  This led to two questions:
>>  - Do you know of some ways to improve strigtemplate performances ?
>>
>
> The biggest thing I remember about previous versions is that they did a
> deep copy instead of a pointer copy when they did set attribute stuff. I
> understand that that has been fixed, what version are you using?

I use version  3.2b1.

  - Are java stringtemplate performances better, or quite the same than
> those of python (I didn't find any benchmark with Stringtemplate on the net)
> ?
>

Java should go much faster.
>

Ok, I definitely will give a try when porting the proto to Java.
Thank you !

-Mathieu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/stringtemplate-interest/attachments/20090301/7847f6d7/attachment.html 


More information about the stringtemplate-interest mailing list