[antlr-interest] parsing BSDL strings and "nested" parsers

[John D. Mitchell]

>>>>> "jkluebs" == jkluebs  <jkluebs at yahoo.com> writes:
[...]
> The thing is that the contents of the strings have semantic meaning that
> can become part of the AST (the contents of the strings have EBNF and
> must be parsed in order to generate a complete BSDL tree).

[...]
> So basically my question is if this idea of having a main parser actions
> spawn new lexer/parser pairs to process its "parsed out" rules is a good
> pattern for my problem, or is there a nicer way.

Sounds like a good approach to me.  The two translators will be cleaner,
clearer, etc.

Take care,
	John

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/