[antlr-interest] Re: Why ANTLR 2.x?
micheal_jor <open.zone at virgin.net>
open.zone at virgin.net
Wed Jan 8 12:07:02 PST 2003
> > - PCCTS 1.33 has a comprehensive manual (Language Translation
Using PCCTS
> > and C++), whereas ANTLR 2.x has no such comprehensive
documentation, to
> > my knowledge.
>
> Hmm... Is the PCCTS book even still in print and available?
In any case, the contents would be broadly applicable to ANTLR 2.x as
well. Right?
> > Are there any compelling reasons to use ANTRL 2.x over 1.33?
>
> The (vast?) majority of people available to help, including Ter,
are using
> Antlr rather than the old PCCTS stuff.
This is a real biggie. If it's good enough for ObiWanTer, ObiWanRic
and ObiWanJohn....
> Antlr also has support for writing your code in Java or C++ or...
...C# for the .NET platform (and potentially the Mono platform) ;-)
Cheers,
Micheal
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list