[antlr-interest] Re: StringTemplate enhancement question

[birmanstefan]

 C inside 
> An interesting alternative.  I think that the "tokens.name,type" is 
> faster to type though ;)
  I was thinking of a more general case when "tokens", "name", "type", 
"Ter", "342" don't come as explicit strings, but as variables eg 
varTokens, varName, varType... Then I would :
   st.setAttributes(varTokens + "." + varName + "," + varType+...,
                    new Object[]{varValName, varValType});
and then you would have to split it. This is the reason behind the 
proposal. Most of the time probably the user would use "tokens.name, 
type".
> 
> I'm guessing that it won't cost much in code/time to interpret the 
> attribute name.  Perhaps I should make it more obvious though like 
> "tokens.{name,type}".
  This is ok, although I do not complain of "tokens.name,type".

  Stefan.

> Ter
> --
> CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
> Cofounder, http://www.knowspam.net enjoy email again!
> Cofounder, http://www.peerscope.com pure link sharing



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/