[antlr-interest] RFC: slight change in ! semantics
Matthew.Ford at forward.com.au
Sun Oct 7 04:38:33 PDT 2001
Actually I was concerned about the code generated.
> .. AST tree that will be generated for parts as INT,
so why not just insist on users using labels where they need them?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public.kherson.ua>
To: <antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] RFC: slight change in ! semantics
> on 10/6/01 14:44, Ric Klaren at klaren at cs.utwente.nl wrote:
> >> but...this extra code will be in ANTLR code generator,
> >> NOT in generated code of parser.
> > Errr it will be *in* the generated code!
> probably you mean AST tree that will be generated for parts as INT,
> yes ?
> But Mathew did worry (IMHO) about code that will differ
> INT items from "declaration" items.
> this code will be on side of ANTLR
> Best regards,
> Ruslan Zasukhin
> e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
> web : http://www.paradigmasoft.com
> To subscribe to the Valentina mail list
> send a letter to valentina-on at lists.macserve.net
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest