[antlr-interest] RFC: slight change in ! semantics

Ruslan Zasukhin sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sun Oct 7 08:01:34 PDT 2001

on 10/7/01 14:38, Matthew Ford at Matthew.Ford at forward.com.au wrote:

> Actually I was concerned about the code generated.
>> .. AST tree that will be generated for parts as INT,
> so why not just insist on users using labels where they need them?

I also vote for this.

Against this will vote only guys who already have some grammars.
But as Terr did mention, probably not labeled INT is used very rarely.

So may be really we can just generate AST for labeled items only.

Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin


e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web   : http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list
send a letter to valentina-on at lists.macserve.net


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

More information about the antlr-interest mailing list