[antlr-interest] Re: Managed to compile under .Net !!
micheal_jor
open.zone at virgin.net
Thu Jul 3 11:18:57 PDT 2003
> > I think it would be good if antlr
> > would provide .NET version of tool. Especially for people who
only
> use the
> > C# version (me). It's easier to integrate into VS and is only
one
> 500K
> > executable file.
>
> Yes, I agree strongly. If you don't use Java for anything else, it
> is just another maintenance burden.
>
> Frank Hileman
Hmmm,....."just another maintenance burden" is an unfair
characterization of Java with respect to ANTLR usage even on
purely .NET projects. Nevertheless, I have wanted to eliminate Java
entirely on many occasions in the past too. In fact, we had a .NET
executable available - courtesy of J# - long before ANTLR/C# was
born. It is seldom used today.
If a decision is taken to _always_ produce a .NET executable of the
ANTLR tool itself using J#, hidden within that is an implicit
assumption then that ANTLR would restrict itself to using JDK1.1.4
features only. Otherwise we end up with two code bases.
Personally, I can see no strong arguments in favour of such a
restriction just to support the availability of a .NET executable.
Of course, if a robust Java-to-CIL compiler were to become
available.....
Cheers,
Micheal
ANTLR/C#
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list