[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules

[John D. Mitchell]

>>>>> "Terence" == Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> writes:
>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2004, at 6:08 AM, Lubos Vnuk writes:
[...]

>> Or "subtoken" ?

> Not bad actually.  "fragment" is not as explicit as subtoken.  What do
> people think of subtoken?

Yuck.  That has a similar problem to "subrule" in that "subtoken" already
has meaning when talking about the parts of a complicated rule (regardless
of whether or not subtoken is specified by a separate subrule or not.

Take care,
	John


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/