[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules

[lgcraymer]

I would agree.  Really, the basic idea is more that of a syllable that
may be included in a word.  I'm not too keen on "fragment" either--you
break things into fragments, you don't build things up from them.

--Loring


--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "John D. Mitchell"
<johnm-antlr at n...> wrote:
> >>>>> "Terence" == Terence Parr <parrt at c...> writes:
> >>>>>> On Nov 9, 2004, at 6:08 AM, Lubos Vnuk writes:
> [...]
> 
> >> Or "subtoken" ?
> 
> > Not bad actually.  "fragment" is not as explicit as subtoken.  What do
> > people think of subtoken?
> 
> Yuck.  That has a similar problem to "subrule" in that "subtoken"
already
> has meaning when talking about the parts of a complicated rule
(regardless
> of whether or not subtoken is specified by a separate subrule or not.
> 
> Take care,
> 	John





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/