[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules
lgcraymer
lgc at mail1.jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Nov 9 17:14:45 PST 2004
I would agree. Really, the basic idea is more that of a syllable that
may be included in a word. I'm not too keen on "fragment" either--you
break things into fragments, you don't build things up from them.
--Loring
--- In antlr-interest at yahoogroups.com, "John D. Mitchell"
<johnm-antlr at n...> wrote:
> >>>>> "Terence" == Terence Parr <parrt at c...> writes:
> >>>>>> On Nov 9, 2004, at 6:08 AM, Lubos Vnuk writes:
> [...]
>
> >> Or "subtoken" ?
>
> > Not bad actually. "fragment" is not as explicit as subtoken. What do
> > people think of subtoken?
>
> Yuck. That has a similar problem to "subrule" in that "subtoken"
already
> has meaning when talking about the parts of a complicated rule
(regardless
> of whether or not subtoken is specified by a separate subrule or not.
>
> Take care,
> John
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list