[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules
Ric Klaren
klaren at cs.utwente.nl
Wed Nov 10 05:05:04 PST 2004
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:14:45AM -0000, lgcraymer wrote:
> I would agree. Really, the basic idea is more that of a syllable that
> may be included in a word. I'm not too keen on "fragment" either--you
> break things into fragments, you don't build things up from them.
Triggered by that last remark:
1. part/partial
2. component/comp
3. alias
4. shorthand
5. abbreviation/abbrev
Cheers,
Ric
--
-----+++++*****************************************************+++++++++-------
---- Ric Klaren ----- j.klaren at utwente.nl ----- +31 53 4893755 ----
-----+++++*****************************************************+++++++++-------
"I don't have anything against Java - it's the best damn implementation
of UCSD Pascal ever released..." --- Larry Smith
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list