[antlr-interest] Re: "protected" lexer rules

[Monty Zukowski]

On Nov 10, 2004, at 5:05 AM, Ric Klaren wrote:

>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:14:45AM -0000, lgcraymer wrote:
>> I would agree.  Really, the basic idea is more that of a syllable that
>> may be included in a word.  I'm not too keen on "fragment" either--you
>> break things into fragments, you don't build things up from them.
>
> Triggered by that last remark:
> 1. part/partial
> 2. component/comp
> 3. alias
> 4. shorthand
> 5. abbreviation/abbrev
>

Riffing on the idea of it being internal:

bone
skeleton
vertebra
rib
bulwark
submerged
invisible
internal

Monty



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antlr-interest/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    antlr-interest-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/