[antlr-interest] 2.8 update

[Mark Miller]

Terence Parr wrote:
> I agreed for BSD on 2.8e (but NOT 2.7.5 and any further bug fix 
> releases) as that was the only way.  Further, 3.0 will be BSD license.

Presumably the BSD without the infamous advertising clause?

Have you considered MIT X? It's essentially equivalent, but doesn't lead to 
people asking the question I ask above. (We use MIT X for all new files added 
to E.)

-- 
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

     Cheers,
     --MarkM