[antlr-interest] 2.8 update

[Terence Parr]

On Feb 5, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:

> Terence Parr wrote:
>> I agreed for BSD on 2.8e (but NOT 2.7.5 and any further bug fix 
>> releases) as that was the only way.  Further, 3.0 will be BSD 
>> license.
>
> Presumably the BSD without the infamous advertising clause?

Which part is that?  The Berkeley ad?

Ter
>
> Have you considered MIT X? It's essentially equivalent, but doesn't 
> lead to people asking the question I ask above. (We use MIT X for all 
> new files added to E.)
>
> -- 
> Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
>
>     Cheers,
>     --MarkM
>