[antlr-interest] v3.0 debug interface

Terence Parr parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Thu Mar 24 18:23:44 PST 2005

On Mar 24, 2005, at 4:28 AM, Scott Stanchfield wrote:

> I would really prefer the transport mechanism to be a plugin. This 
> would
> allow socket-based transport if desired, or direct observer 
> communication.
> No need to do network I/O if not necessary.

Correct...i'll use the interface to swap in a proxy only if you wanna 
go across the socket.

> The plugin would be responsible for the unicast/multicast support.

Yeah, even in the nonsocket case; that's sort of similar to the 
daisychaining thingie i was talking about.

> That said, an implementation in Eclipse would need to use socket-based
> communication ;)

Really?  Oh well; good to know.

CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com

More information about the antlr-interest mailing list