[antlr-interest] v3.0 debug interface
Terence Parr
parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Thu Mar 24 18:23:44 PST 2005
On Mar 24, 2005, at 4:28 AM, Scott Stanchfield wrote:
> I would really prefer the transport mechanism to be a plugin. This
> would
> allow socket-based transport if desired, or direct observer
> communication.
> No need to do network I/O if not necessary.
Correct...i'll use the interface to swap in a proxy only if you wanna
go across the socket.
> The plugin would be responsible for the unicast/multicast support.
Yeah, even in the nonsocket case; that's sort of similar to the
daisychaining thingie i was talking about.
> That said, an implementation in Eclipse would need to use socket-based
> communication ;)
Really? Oh well; good to know.
Ter
--
CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list