[antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+

Michel Metzger metzgerm at iro.umontreal.ca
Wed May 18 11:17:07 PDT 2005


+1

Terence Parr a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I'm leaning towards allowing rule+ as Scott and others have asked  
> for.  I usually am for consistency, but I'm wondering if this is a  
> case where consistency with "standard" EBNF is better than forcing  
> the ANTLR consistency that all subrules have parentheses.
>
> Please, no long arguments!  A simple +1 or -1 or 0 will suffice with  
> a few comments if you want.
>
> Thanks,
> Ter
> -- 
> CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com




More information about the antlr-interest mailing list