[antlr-interest] votes on rule+ vs (rule)+

[stefan]

I agree +1 :) 

How will we write next rule:

a_rule:
    #(ANA ( woo {some actions;} )+ );

stefan.
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 21:15, Terence Parr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm leaning towards allowing rule+ as Scott and others have asked
> for.  I usually am for consistency, but I'm wondering if this is a
> case where consistency with "standard" EBNF is better than forcing
> the ANTLR consistency that all subrules have parentheses.
>
> Please, no long arguments!  A simple +1 or -1 or 0 will suffice with
> a few comments if you want.
>
> Thanks,
> Ter
> --
> CS Professor & Grad Director, University of San Francisco
> Creator, ANTLR Parser Generator, http://www.antlr.org
> Cofounder, http://www.jguru.com