[antlr-interest] followup to v3 speed

Terence Parr parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Sat May 27 18:17:44 PDT 2006


On May 27, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:

> On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 18:00 -0700, Terence Parr wrote:
>> On May 27, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 11:56 -0700, Terence Parr wrote:
>>>> Now the big question: do I leave in the good error handling by
>>>> default or is that an option?
>>>
>>> What does "good error handling" mean again?
>>
>> Better than v2 ;)  See the blogs, various v3 ppt files.
>
> I assume you're referring to the "exceptions as flow control" :) In  
> any
> case, it doesn't really bother me which one it is so long as its fast
> because I hardly had to debug the generated code, and it was fine to
> debug with v2 :)

I mean that the error reporting and recovery are superior...has  
nothing to do with syn preds. :)

> Although I'm likely to start going with the C or C++ codegen soon :)
>
> You're the man for asking!

:)  Gotta give the customer what they want...

Ter


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list