On Jul 2, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Diehl, Matthew J wrote: > And then it's fine. I think this should maybe be fixed (is it a > bug?), > but it's not too hard to work around...just makes the code a little > harder to read. It's listed as an improvement: http://www.antlr.org:8888/browse/ANTLR-129 :) Ter