[antlr-interest] [v3] Lack of documentation
Micheal J
open.zone at virgin.net
Tue Jul 3 05:32:44 PDT 2007
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
> [mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of Terence Parr
> Sent: 02 July 2007 06:10
> To: ANTLR Interest
> Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] [v3] Lack of documentation
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2007, at 7:56 PM, scott at javadude.com wrote:
> > First -- I bought both books (and have contributed to ANTLR
> 2 and the
> > eclipse plugins). I've used past versions of the tool (since early
> > PCCTS
> > releases), but had a lot of trouble figuring out v3 without
> the book.
> >
> > How is forcing someone to pay for the documentation any
> different than
> > requiring a paid license for the tool? This is most definitely not
> > in the
> > spirit of open source.
>
> Well, then I better get rid of ANTLR v3 as it is against your
> definition of free software.
>
> Sorry Scott, but you are a total pain in my ass; always have been.
<SNIP>
Sadly, an Ad Hominem response doesn't advance the debate.
I disagree with Scott profoundly but, I'd still like to understand his
position.
E.g. What problems did he have to resort to the book to resolve?. Are they
trivial user-space problems or, integration issues that require indepth
knowledage of v3 implementation?
Micheal
-----------------------
The best way to contact me is via the list/forum. My time is very limited.
More information about the antlr-interest
mailing list