[antlr-interest] project kick-off..

Dr. Hartmut Kocher hwk.cortex-brainware at t-online.de
Mon Mar 12 08:02:24 PDT 2007

I am using V3 with C# code generation. I ran into a couple of bugs. I posted
fixes for them on this list. So you might search the archive. You have to
rebuild ANTLR from the sources but then it works for me.


It’s a lot faster than ANTLR2. If it is a long term project I would use V3,
for a fast hack I’d stick to ANTLR2 for now.


Kind regards


Dr. Hartmut Kocher

Cortex Brainware Consulting & Training GmbH

Kirchplatz 5
D-82049 Pullach

Tel: +49 (89) 744  850 0
Fax: +49 (89) 744  850 11

 <http://www.cortex-brainware.de/> http://www.cortex-brainware.de

E-Mail: hwk at cortex-brainware.de

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
HRB-Nr. 120614

Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer:
Dipl.-Inform. Dorothea Burger, Dr.-Ing. Hartmut Kocher, Dr.-Ing. Martin
Lang, Dr. rer. nat. Rolf Peter Wehrum 


Von: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] Im Auftrag von Rob Hill
Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2007 00:22
An: 'ANTLR Interest'
Betreff: [antlr-interest] project kick-off..


And i’m wondering what state the C# codegen is like for V3. I see the web
page states that it’s currently playing catchup to v3.0b3. So before I
embark on another monumental parsing task, i’d kind of like to know if the
C# output is upto scratch.

Has anyone used the C# output in anger? If not anger, mild annoyance would
be adequate ;)




Ps.. Ter, was it intentional that PyST sounds like ‘pissed’ or is it meant
to sound like ‘pie-st’? ;)  i think the first one has a much better ring.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/attachments/20070312/bb4aa680/attachment.html 

More information about the antlr-interest mailing list