[antlr-interest] wildcard in tree grammar

Terence Parr parrt at cs.usfca.edu
Mon Oct 20 11:53:49 PDT 2008


On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Sam Harwell wrote:

> Since ^(. item) is valid, I think ^. as a dedicated operator is more
> appropriate than ^(.).

I just tried ^(. X) and it fails to compile ;)

Wildcard seems super broken in tree grammars I'm afraid.

Ter


More information about the antlr-interest mailing list