[antlr-interest] wildcard in tree grammar

[Sam Harwell]

I meant valid in theory. :)

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: Terence Parr [mailto:parrt at cs.usfca.edu] 
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 1:54 PM
To: Sam Harwell
Cc: antlr-interest Interest
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] wildcard in tree grammar


On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Sam Harwell wrote:

> Since ^(. item) is valid, I think ^. as a dedicated operator is more
> appropriate than ^(.).

I just tried ^(. X) and it fails to compile ;)

Wildcard seems super broken in tree grammars I'm afraid.

Ter