[antlr-interest] How viable is the Csharp3 target?

[Sam Harwell]

Hi Andy & Maik,

I agree that the C# target documentation is lacking in many ways. I try to
keep enough documentation at the following page to get you started on the
right path:
http://www.antlr.org/wiki/display/ANTLR3/Antlr3CSharpReleases

I've been using the CSharp3 target in a commercial product for 3 years now.
At this point, most of the remaining the issues I have with it are
basic/technical limitations of ANTLR 3 that will hopefully be resolved in
later versions.

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org
[mailto:antlr-interest-bounces at antlr.org] On Behalf Of pragmaik
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:36 AM
To: antlr-interest at antlr.org
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] How viable is the Csharp3 target?

Hi Andy!

I am using ANTLR's C# target for a couple of weeks now to create a domain
specific language that is a subset of the C programming language.

My experience is similar to yours, but I can assure you that the C# target
works and that it is actively maintained. It differs from the Java target in
a few places, but it works.

The biggest problem is finding documentation. I've both of Terence Parr's
books on my desk and the folks on this mailing list are very friendly and
competent.

Cheers,
Maik


--
View this message in context:
http://antlr.1301665.n2.nabble.com/How-viable-is-the-Csharp3-target-tp690889
0p6908949.html
Sent from the ANTLR mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address