[antlr-interest] anybody care to comment on bitbucket.org?

[Dave Thomas]

I haven't used bitbucket yet but mercurial was an easy switch from
subversion.  I found Mercurial's built-in documentation clearer than that
of git but git has lots of books out.  Mercurial has some nice standard
features (like queues, which I looked at for pushing changes to multiple
targets at my current contract) but git is know to have more flexibility;
this classic post explains but may be out of date:
http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/git-vs-mercurial/  .  Git
has much broader adoption - see
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=git%2C+mercurial&l=.  I would go with Git
for its user base alone.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Terence Parr <parrt at cs.usfca.edu> wrote:

> Contemplating switch to mercurial and hosting at bitbucket.org.
> Ter
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>